How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 70+ vs Find N6

Motorola Razr 70+ vs OPPO Find N6

What Razr 70+ does better (4) and where Find N6 wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 70+
Motorola · 2026Razr 70+
7.5Score
4 advantages≈ $1,050
vs
OPPO Find N6
OPPO · 2026Find N6
9.5Score
16 advantages≈ $1,350
Higher score
9.2Display6.9
6.2Camera9.3
5.8Battery9.6
6.1Features8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 70+Find N6
74 × 171.47.1145.6 × 159.94.2
Razr 70+Find N6Difference
Height171.4 mm159.9 mm+11.5 mm
Width74 mm145.6 mm−71.6 mm
Thickness7.1 mm4.2 mm+2.9 mm
Weight189 g225 g−36 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 70+ better than Find N6?

  1. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  2. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 2,500 nits+20%
  3. Weight189 g vs 225 g+19%
  4. Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%

Why is Find N6 better than Razr 70+?

  1. Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
  2. Wired charging45 W vs 80 W+78%
  3. Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+33%
  4. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  5. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 70+: Yes
  6. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  7. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+53%
  8. Wireless charging power15 W vs 50 W3.3×
  9. Resolution (width)1,084 px vs 2,248 px2.1×
  10. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  11. Screen size6.9″ vs 8.1″+18%
  12. Thickness7.1 mm vs 4.2 mm+69%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr 70+Motorola Razr 70+≈ $1,0507.5
OPPO Find N6OPPO Find N6≈ $1,3509.5
Design
Weight189 g225 g
Thickness7.1 mm4.2 mm
Height171.4 mm159.9 mm
Width74 mm145.6 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP48IP58
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursPantone: Mountain ViewBlossom Orange, Stellar Titanium, Pearl Black
Display
Screen size6.9″8.1″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,084 px2,248 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,480 px
Pixel density414 ppi412 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits2,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,586 nits
Screen-to-body ratio85.1%90.9%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency3 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Adreno 840
AnTuTu score—2,627,421
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,538
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—7,114
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.95"—
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,500 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—15.8 h
Wired charging45 W80 W
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W50 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.4—
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.1
USB version23.1
Satellite messaging—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-29.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—ColorOS 16
Major OS updates promised3—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle49 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classB—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare