How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 50 vs Phantom V Fold2

Motorola Razr 50 vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2

What Razr 50 does better (9) and where Phantom V Fold2 wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 50
Motorola · 2024Razr 50
5.4Score
9 advantages≈ $600
vs
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Tecno · 2024Phantom V Fold2
6.5Score
13 advantages≈ $440
Higher score
7.2Display6.3
3.0Performance5.6
4.1Camera5.8
4.6Battery7.0
7.8Features3.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 50Phantom V Fold2
74 × 171.37.3140.4 × 1596.1
Razr 50Phantom V Fold2Difference
Height171.3 mm159 mm+12.3 mm
Width74 mm140.4 mm−66.4 mm
Thickness7.3 mm6.1 mm+1.2 mm
Weight188 g249 g−61 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 50 better than Phantom V Fold2?

  1. Measured brightness1,289 nits vs 573 nits2.2×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  3. Active use (test)11.8 h vs 9.6 h+23%
  4. Weight188 g vs 249 g+32%
  5. 4K selfie videoYes · Phantom V Fold2: No
  6. eSIMYes · Phantom V Fold2: No
  7. Pixel density413 ppi vs 388 ppi+6%
  8. Loudspeaker loudness-23.5 LUFS vs -27.1 LUFS+-13%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%

Why is Phantom V Fold2 better than Razr 50?

  1. Wired charging30 W vs 70 W2.3×
  2. AnTuTu score657,381 vs 1,158,040+76%
  3. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme856 vs 2,5593×
  4. Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 5,750 mAh+37%
  5. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 50: Yes
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,016 vs 4,327+43%
  7. CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+28%
  8. Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  9. Screen size6.9″ vs 7.8″+14%
  10. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 2,000 px+85%
  11. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  12. Thickness7.3 mm vs 6.1 mm+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr 50Motorola Razr 50≈ $6005.4
Design
Weight188 g249 g
Thickness7.3 mm6.1 mm
Height171.3 mm159 mm
Width74 mm140.4 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackSilicone polymer—
Ingress protectionIPX8IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursKoala Grey (Steel Wool), Beach Sand (Pumice Stone), Spritz Orange (Arabesque)Karst Green, Rippling Blue
Stylus—Yes
Display
Screen size6.9″7.8″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px2,000 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,296 px
Pixel density413 ppi388 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits—
Measured brightness1,289 nits573 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.9%88.2%
HDRYes—
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7300XMediatek Dimensity 9000+
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Mali-G710 MC10
AnTuTu score657,3811,158,040
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,0164,327
3DMark Wild Life Extreme8562,559
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB512 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.3"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom2×2×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,200 mAh5,750 mAh
Active use (test)11.8 h9.6 h
Wired charging30 W70 W
Charged in 30 min—75%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W15 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.5 LUFS-27.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HiOS 14 Fold
Major OS updates promised—2
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare