How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 50 vs Phantom V Flip

Motorola Razr 50 vs Tecno Phantom V Flip

What Razr 50 does better (16) and where Phantom V Flip wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 50
Motorola · 2024Razr 50
5.4Score
16 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Tecno Phantom V Flip
Tecno · 2023Phantom V Flip
4.4Score
5 advantages≈ $600
7.2Display3.8
3.0Performance2.0
4.1Camera3.9
4.6Battery3.6
7.8Features4.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 50Phantom V Flip
74 × 171.37.374.1 × 171.77
Razr 50Phantom V FlipDifference
Height171.3 mm171.7 mm−0.4 mm
Width74 mm74.1 mm−0.1 mm
Thickness7.3 mm7 mm+0.3 mm
Weight188 g194 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 50 better than Phantom V Flip?

  1. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits3×
  2. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  4. Optical stabilisationYes · Phantom V Flip: No
  5. Wireless chargingYes · Phantom V Flip: No
  6. AnTuTu score657,381 vs 565,851+16%
  7. Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+5%
  8. Measured brightness1,289 nits vs 818 nits+58%
  9. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,016 vs 2,805+8%
  10. 4K selfie videoYes · Phantom V Flip: No
  11. eSIMYes · Phantom V Flip: No
  12. Dual SIMYes · Phantom V Flip: No

Why is Phantom V Flip better than Razr 50?

  1. Wired charging30 W vs 45 W+50%
  2. Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
  3. CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz+20%
  4. Thickness7.3 mm vs 7 mm+4%
  5. Loudspeaker loudness-23.5 LUFS vs -22.7 LUFS+-3%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr 50Motorola Razr 50≈ $6005.4
Design
Weight188 g194 g
Thickness7.3 mm7 mm
Height171.3 mm171.7 mm
Width74 mm74.1 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerEco leather
Ingress protectionIPX8—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursKoala Grey (Steel Wool), Beach Sand (Pumice Stone), Spritz Orange (Arabesque)Iconic Black, Mystic Dawn
Display
Screen size6.9″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,640 px
Pixel density413 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits1,000 nits
Measured brightness1,289 nits818 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.9%84.6%
HDRYes—
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7300XMediatek Dimensity 8050
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process4 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.5 GHz3 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Mali-G77 MC9
AnTuTu score657,381565,851
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,0162,805
3DMark Wild Life Extreme856—
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP64 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.73"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Optical zoom2×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,200 mAh4,000 mAh
Active use (test)11.8 h—
Wired charging30 W45 W
Charged in 30 min—100%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.1
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS—
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.5 LUFS-22.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare