- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 50 vs Razr 60
Motorola Razr 50 vs Motorola Razr 60
What Razr 50 does better (2) and where Razr 60 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 50Razr 60
| Razr 50 | Razr 60 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.3 mm | 171.3 mm | = |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.3 mm | = |
| Weight | 188 g | 188 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 50 better than Razr 60?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,016 vs 2,559+18%
- Measured brightness1,289 nits vs 1,180 nits+9%
Why is Razr 60 better than Razr 50?
- AnTuTu score657,381 vs 886,677+35%
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 171.3 mm | 171.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IPX8 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Koala Grey (Steel Wool), Beach Sand (Pumice Stone), Spritz Orange (Arabesque) | Pantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink, Swarovski edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,289 nits | 1,180 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 84.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 657,381 | 886,677 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,016 | 2,559 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 856 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 11.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 61% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 45 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
