How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 2026 vs Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

Motorola Razr 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

What Razr 2026 does better (6) and where Galaxy Z Flip7 FE wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 2026
Motorola · 2026Razr 2026
7.1Score
6 advantages≈ $750
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
6.2Score
6 advantages≈ $530
7.2Display5.8
5.2Camera4.0
6.0Battery3.0
7.8Features8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 2026Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
74 × 171.37.371.9 × 165.16.9
Razr 2026Galaxy Z Flip7 FEDifference
Height171.3 mm165.1 mm+6.2 mm
Width74 mm71.9 mm+2.1 mm
Thickness7.3 mm6.9 mm+0.4 mm
Weight188 g187 g+1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 2026 better than Galaxy Z Flip7 FE?

  1. Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+20%
  2. Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
  3. Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
  4. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 2,600 nits+15%
  5. Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%
  6. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%

Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better than Razr 2026?

  1. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+23%
  2. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  3. Pixel density413 ppi vs 426 ppi+3%
  4. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  5. CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
  6. Thickness7.3 mm vs 6.9 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight188 g187 g
Thickness7.3 mm6.9 mm
Height171.3 mm165.1 mm
Width74 mm71.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP48IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursPantone: Hematite, Sporting Green, Violet Ice, Bright WhiteBlack, White
Display
Screen size6.9″6.7″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,640 px
Pixel density413 ppi426 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits2,600 nits
Measured brightness—1,444 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.9%85.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7450XExynos 2400
Chip makerMediaTekExynos
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores810
CPU frequency2.6 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score—1,355,845
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,108
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,036
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.57"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Optical zoom—2×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP10 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,800 mAh4,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—10.2 h
Wired charging30 W25 W
Charged in 30 min—50%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W15 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.84 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 8
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,700
Endurance per cycle—37 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare