- android.gs
- Compare
- One 5G Ace vs Galaxy XCover 5
Motorola One 5G Ace vs Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
What One 5G Ace does better (15) and where Galaxy XCover 5 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display2.8
6.5Camera3.1
4.0Battery2.4
5.6Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
One 5G AceGalaxy XCover 5
| One 5G Ace | Galaxy XCover 5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 147.1 mm | +19 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 71.6 mm | +4.5 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 9.2 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 172 g | +40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is One 5G Ace better than Galaxy XCover 5?
- Main camera48 MP vs 16 MP3×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh+67%
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- 5GYes · Galaxy XCover 5: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 5 MP3.2×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 5.3″+26%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 311 ppi+26%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Galaxy XCover 5: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
Why is Galaxy XCover 5 better than One 5G Ace?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
- Weight212 g vs 172 g+23%
- Dual SIMNo · One 5G Ace: Yes
- Thickness9.9 mm vs 9.2 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 147.1 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 71.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 5.3″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,480 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 311 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 67.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Exynos 850 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 |
| AnTuTu score | 540,590 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,079 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 3,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.7 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6.1 |
