- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto X50 Ultra vs Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Motorola Moto X50 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
What Moto X50 Ultra does better (17) and where Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display8.8
9.4Camera8.7
7.7Battery6.4
8.8Features8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto X50 UltraRedmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
| Moto X50 Ultra | Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 162.5 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 72.4 mm | 74.7 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 205 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto X50 Ultra better than Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G?
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Wired charging125 W vs 120 W+4%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G: No
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+20%
- Weight197 g vs 205 g+4%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
Why is Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G better than Moto X50 Ultra?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,110 mAh+14%
- eSIMNo · Moto X50 Ultra: Yes
- Peak brightness2,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 72.4 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Forest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach Fuzz | Lavender Purple, Frost Blue, Midnight Black, Sand Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,712 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,500 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.9% | 88.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 810 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 750,292 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,234 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,049 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,110 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.7 h |
| Wired charging | 125 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 50 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A56vsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G8.58.7vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5GvsTecno Camon 40 Pro8.78.6
vsGoogle Pixel 9avsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G8.88.7vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5GvsRealme P48.78.6vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+8.78.6vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5GvsOPPO Reno13 F 4G8.78.6