- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto X40 vs nubia RedMagic 6
Motorola Moto X40 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 6
What Moto X40 does better (16) and where nubia RedMagic 6 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display8.3
9.1Camera7.7
7.1Battery7.9
9.1Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto X40nubia RedMagic 6
| Moto X40 | nubia RedMagic 6 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 169.9 mm | −8.7 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77.2 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 9.7 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 220 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto X40 better than nubia RedMagic 6?
- Wired charging125 W vs 66 W+89%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia RedMagic 6: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 6: No
- Wireless chargingYes · nubia RedMagic 6: No
- Selfie camera60 MP vs 8 MP7.5×
- Charged in 30 min214% vs 79%2.7×
- 4K selfie videoYes · nubia RedMagic 6: No
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+13%
- Weight199 g vs 220 g+11%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Process4 nm vs 5 nm+25%
Why is nubia RedMagic 6 better than Moto X40?
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,050 mAh+10%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Moto X40: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 220 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 9.7 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 169.9 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Eclipse Black, Aurora |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 630 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 444 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 85.1% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 708,853 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,586 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 60 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 125 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 214% | 79% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | — | 3 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -21.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
