- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto X40 vs GT2 Explorer Master
Motorola Moto X40 vs Realme GT2 Explorer Master
What Moto X40 does better (9) and where GT2 Explorer Master wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display7.9
9.1Camera8.6
7.1Battery7.7
9.1Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto X40GT2 Explorer Master
| Moto X40 | GT2 Explorer Master | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 161.3 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74.3 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto X40 better than GT2 Explorer Master?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · GT2 Explorer Master: No
- Wireless chargingYes · GT2 Explorer Master: No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Wired charging125 W vs 100 W+25%
- Selfie camera60 MP vs 16 MP3.8×
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoYes · GT2 Explorer Master: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 4+62%
Why is GT2 Explorer Master better than Moto X40?
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight199 g vs 195 g+2%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 8.2 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 161.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Ceramic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Gray, White, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 798 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 90.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,045,876 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,021 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 60 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 125 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 214% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
