- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto X30 Pro vs iQOO 11
Motorola Moto X30 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 11
What Moto X30 Pro does better (9) and where iQOO 11 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display9.3
9.1Camera8.8
7.9Battery7.8
9.0Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto X30 ProiQOO 11
| Moto X30 Pro | iQOO 11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.7 mm | 164.9 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Width | 73.5 mm | 77.1 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 198 g | 205 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto X30 Pro better than iQOO 11?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Wireless chargingYes · iQOO 11: No
- Selfie camera60 MP vs 16 MP3.8×
- Wired charging125 W vs 120 W+4%
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO 11: No
- Charged in 30 min214% vs 120%+78%
- Weight198 g vs 205 g+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio91.2% vs 87.3%+4%
Why is iQOO 11 better than Moto X30 Pro?
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,610 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+8%
- Peak brightness1,250 nits vs 1,800 nits+44%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 518 ppi+32%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 161.7 mm | 164.9 mm |
| Width | 73.5 mm | 77.1 mm |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | White, Black | Black, Green, White (BMW M branding) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | LTPO4 AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 518 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,250 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,147 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.2% | 87.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,281,665 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,803 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.22" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 60 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,610 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 125 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 214% | 120% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 14 (International) |
