- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto S50 vs Y200 Pro
Motorola Moto S50 vs Vivo Y200 Pro
What Moto S50 does better (22) and where Y200 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto S50Y200 Pro
| Moto S50 | Y200 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 154.1 mm | 164.4 mm | −10.3 mm |
| Width | 71.2 mm | 74.9 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 170 g | 172 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto S50 better than Y200 Pro?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,300 nits2.3×
- Wired charging68 W vs 44 W+55%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Y200 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Y200 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Y200 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Y200 Pro: No
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y200 Pro: No
Why is Y200 Pro better than Moto S50?
- Battery capacity4,310 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+16%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.8″+7%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.5 mm+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 170 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 154.1 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 71.2 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Nautical Blue, Latte, Poinciana | Silk black, Silk green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,670 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 94.4% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 561,575 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,201 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.5" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,310 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 115% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 14 |
