- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G84 vs T2 Pro
Motorola Moto G84 vs Vivo T2 Pro
What Moto G84 does better (12) and where T2 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G84T2 Pro
| Moto G84 | T2 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 164.1 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 74.8 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 167 g | 175 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G84 better than T2 Pro?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- NFCYes · T2 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T2 Pro: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+9%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · T2 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · T2 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T2 Pro: No
- Weight167 g vs 175 g+5%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 388 ppi+4%
Why is T2 Pro better than Moto G84?
- Wired charging30 W vs 66 W2.2×
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min54% vs 68%+26%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.7% vs 90.4%+5%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 7.4 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 167 g | 175 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta | Moon Black, Dune Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 996 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 90.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 389,015 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,824 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.5" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 12.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 54% | 68% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | Funtouch 13 |
