- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G84 vs Spark 20 Pro
Motorola Moto G84 vs Tecno Spark 20 Pro
What Moto G84 does better (11) and where Spark 20 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display6.5
4.0Performance4.9
8.0Camera6.6
4.3Battery6.0
6.8Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G84Spark 20 Pro
| Moto G84 | Spark 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 168.6 mm | −8.6 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 76.6 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 167 g | 206 g | −39 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G84 better than Spark 20 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 580 nits2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Spark 20 Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Spark 20 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Spark 20 Pro: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Weight167 g vs 206 g+24%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Spark 20 Pro: No
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 396 ppi+2%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.4 mm+11%
- Charged in 30 min54% vs 50%+8%
Why is Spark 20 Pro better than Moto G84?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- AnTuTu score389,015 vs 586,415+51%
- Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,824 vs 1,928+6%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 167 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Colours | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta | Moonlit Black, Frosty Ivory, Sunset Blush, Magic Skin 2.0 Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 580 nits |
| Measured brightness | 996 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 389,015 | 586,415 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,824 | 1,928 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.5" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 54% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | HIOS 13 |
