- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G82 vs Pova 4 Pro
Motorola Moto G82 vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
What Moto G82 does better (13) and where Pova 4 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display6.3
3.7Performance4.4
8.0Camera4.6
5.5Battery8.3
6.3Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G82Pova 4 Pro
| Moto G82 | Pova 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.9 mm | 164.8 mm | −3.9 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 77 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 211 g | −38 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G82 better than Pova 4 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Weight173 g vs 211 g+22%
- Memory card slotYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 450 nits+11%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme361 vs 346+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness8 mm vs 9.2 mm+15%
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than Moto G82?
- AnTuTu score380,812 vs 556,518+46%
- Wired charging30 W vs 45 W+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,977 vs 2,047+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min57% vs 62%+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 160.9 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Meteorite Gray, White Lily | Fluorite Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 690 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 380,812 | 556,518 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,977 | 2,047 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 361 | 346 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 57% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 8.6 |
