- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G77 vs RugOne Xever 8
Motorola Moto G77 vs UleFone RugOne Xever 8
What Moto G77 does better (15) and where RugOne Xever 8 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display4.2
8.7Camera6.8
7.1Battery3.3
7.7Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G77RugOne Xever 8
| Moto G77 | RugOne Xever 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 168 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 80 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 14 mm | −6.7 mm |
| Weight | 182 g | 320 g | −138 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G77 better than RugOne Xever 8?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 680 nits7.4×
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- OLED panelYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- 5GYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+11%
- Weight182 g vs 320 g+76%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- eSIMYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 14 mm+92%
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 395 ppi+14%
Why is RugOne Xever 8 better than Moto G77?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 182 g | 320 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 80 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Pantone: Black Olive, Shaded Spruce | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 680 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.5% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 590,471 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,138 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 61 h | — |
| Repairability class | A | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
