- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G73 vs Redmi Note 12 4G
Motorola Moto G73 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
What Moto G73 does better (8) and where Redmi Note 12 4G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display8.0
4.6Performance3.6
6.6Camera6.2
5.5Battery6.0
8.1Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G73Redmi Note 12 4G
| Moto G73 | Redmi Note 12 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.4 mm | 165.7 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 184 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G73 better than Redmi Note 12 4G?
- AnTuTu score553,717 vs 319,219+73%
- 5GYes · Redmi Note 12 4G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 12 4G: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,299 vs 1,797+28%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Redmi Note 12 4G better than Moto G73?
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,200 nits2.4×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G73: Yes
- Measured brightness494 nits vs 744 nits+51%
- Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.9 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 161.4 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Lucent White, Midnight Blue | Onyx Gray, Mint Green, Ice Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 494 nits | 744 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 930 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 553,717 | 319,219 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,299 | 1,797 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.9 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | HyperOS |
