- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G73 vs Galaxy A23 5G
Motorola Moto G73 vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
What Moto G73 does better (11) and where Galaxy A23 5G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display5.5
4.6Performance3.4
6.6Camera7.6
5.5Battery5.3
8.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G73Galaxy A23 5G
| Moto G73 | Galaxy A23 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.4 mm | 165.4 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76.9 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 197 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G73 better than Galaxy A23 5G?
- AnTuTu score553,717 vs 318,821+74%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A23 5G: No
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,299 vs 1,940+19%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 450 nits+11%
- Weight181 g vs 197 g+9%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.6% vs 82.5%+4%
Why is Galaxy A23 5G better than Moto G73?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G73: Yes
- Measured brightness494 nits vs 508 nits+3%
- Charged in 30 min52% vs 58%+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 161.4 mm | 165.4 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Lucent White, Midnight Blue | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 494 nits | 508 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 82.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 930 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 553,717 | 318,821 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,299 | 1,940 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 352 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.49 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | One UI 6 |
