- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G73 vs Galaxy A15 5G
Motorola Moto G73 vs Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
What Moto G73 does better (9) and where Galaxy A15 5G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display6.7
4.6Performance3.2
6.6Camera6.2
5.5Battery5.8
8.1Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G73Galaxy A15 5G
| Moto G73 | Galaxy A15 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.4 mm | 160.1 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76.8 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 200 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G73 better than Galaxy A15 5G?
- AnTuTu score553,717 vs 306,274+81%
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A15 5G: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,299 vs 1,747+32%
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight181 g vs 200 g+10%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 396 ppi+2%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
Why is Galaxy A15 5G better than Moto G73?
- OLED panelNo · Moto G73: Yes
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 800 nits+60%
- Measured brightness494 nits vs 786 nits+59%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 161.4 mm | 160.1 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Lucent White, Midnight Blue | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Magical Blue, Optimistic Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 494 nits | 786 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 930 | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 553,717 | 306,274 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,299 | 1,747 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 335 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.5 h |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | 51% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
