- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G72 vs 12 Lite
Motorola Moto G72 vs Xiaomi 12 Lite
What Moto G72 does better (7) and where 12 Lite wins (13) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G7212 Lite
| Moto G72 | 12 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.5 mm | 159.3 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 73.7 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.3 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 166 g | 173 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G72 better than 12 Lite?
- Stereo speakersYes · 12 Lite: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+16%
- Measured brightness1,015 nits vs 824 nits+23%
- Memory card slotYes · 12 Lite: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · 12 Lite: No
- Weight166 g vs 173 g+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
Why is 12 Lite better than Moto G72?
- Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
- AnTuTu score383,317 vs 528,905+38%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,842 vs 2,943+60%
- 5GNo · Moto G72: Yes
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 950 nits+90%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx3+50%
- Charged in 30 min53% vs 115%2.2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 7.3 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 166 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 160.5 mm | 159.3 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Meteorite Gray, Polar Blue, Mineral White | Black, Lite Green, Lite Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 950 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,015 nits | 824 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 88.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 383,317 | 528,905 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,842 | 2,943 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 347 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 53% | 115% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.5 LUFS | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
