- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G71 5G vs Galaxy A53 5G
Motorola Moto G71 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
What Moto G71 5G does better (4) and where Galaxy A53 5G wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display7.4
6.6Camera8.7
6.0Battery5.3
5.6Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G71 5GGalaxy A53 5G
| Moto G71 5G | Galaxy A53 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 159.6 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.8 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.1 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 189 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G71 5G better than Galaxy A53 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A53 5G: No
- Weight179 g vs 189 g+6%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 45%+11%
Why is Galaxy A53 5G better than Moto G71 5G?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx73.5×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G71 5G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G71 5G: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Memory card slotNo · Moto G71 5G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Moto G71 5G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 159.6 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Neptune Green, Arctic Blue, Iron Black | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 830 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 85.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Exynos 1280 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 329,802 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,891 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 635 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| SAR (head) | 1.03 W/kg | 0.89 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
