- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G67 vs Camon 50 Pro 4G
Motorola Moto G67 vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
What Moto G67 does better (6) and where Camon 50 Pro 4G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display9.7
6.8Camera9.0
7.1Battery8.6
7.7Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G67Camon 50 Pro 4G
| Moto G67 | Camon 50 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 162.4 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 77 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 182 g | 171 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G67 better than Camon 50 Pro 4G?
- 5GYes · Camon 50 Pro 4G: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 50 Pro 4G: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 429 ppi+5%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,208 px+5%
Why is Camon 50 Pro 4G better than Moto G67?
- Wired charging30 W vs 60 W2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G67: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Moto G67: Yes
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+18%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight182 g vs 171 g+6%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 182 g | 171 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Unspecified |
| Colours | Pantone: Nile, Arctic Seal | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Ethereal blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.5% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 569,394 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,034 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 60 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 59 h | — |
| Repairability class | A | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
