- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G60S vs Poco F3
Motorola Moto G60S vs Xiaomi Poco F3
What Moto G60S does better (8) and where Poco F3 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G60SPoco F3
| Moto G60S | Poco F3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.7 mm | 163.7 mm | +6 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 196 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G60S better than Poco F3?
- Wired charging50 W vs 33 W+52%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,520 mAh+11%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Memory card slotYes · Poco F3: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F3: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco F3: No
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Poco F3 better than Moto G60S?
- Peak brightness562 nits vs 1,300 nits2.3×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G60S: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · Moto G60S: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G60S: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+56%
- Weight212 g vs 196 g+8%
- Process12 nm vs 7 nm+71%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Thickness9.6 mm vs 7.8 mm+23%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 169.7 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Green, Blue | Arctic White, Night Black, Deep Ocean Blue, Moonlight Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 562 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 716 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3% | 85.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 631,850 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,206 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,213 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,520 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 50 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
