- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G60 vs Galaxy M52 5G
Motorola Moto G60 vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
What Moto G60 does better (4) and where Galaxy M52 5G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display6.8
8.4Camera7.5
7.3Battery5.3
4.1Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G60Galaxy M52 5G
| Moto G60 | Galaxy M52 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.6 mm | 164.2 mm | +5.4 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 9.8 mm | 7.4 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Weight | 225 g | 173 g | +52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G60 better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy M52 5G: No
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than Moto G60?
- OLED panelNo · Moto G60: Yes
- 5GNo · Moto G60: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Wired charging20 W vs 25 W+25%
- Weight225 g vs 173 g+30%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Process8 nm vs 6 nm+33%
- Thickness9.8 mm vs 7.4 mm+32%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 225 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 9.8 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 169.6 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3% | 86.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 504,424 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 679 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.85 W/kg | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5.1 |
