- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G60 vs Galaxy A52s 5G
Motorola Moto G60 vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
What Moto G60 does better (4) and where Galaxy A52s 5G wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.4
8.4Camera8.7
7.3Battery3.2
4.1Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G60Galaxy A52s 5G
| Moto G60 | Galaxy A52s 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.6 mm | 159.9 mm | +9.7 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.1 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.8 mm | 8.4 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Weight | 225 g | 189 g | +36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G60 better than Galaxy A52s 5G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+33%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+5%
Why is Galaxy A52s 5G better than Moto G60?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx73.5×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G60: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G60: Yes
- 5GNo · Moto G60: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G60: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Wired charging20 W vs 25 W+25%
- Weight225 g vs 189 g+19%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 405 ppi+3%
- Process8 nm vs 6 nm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 225 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 9.8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 169.6 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3% | 84.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 429,675 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 11,060 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 685 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.85 W/kg | 0.88 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6 |
