- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G54 5G vs V29
Motorola Moto G54 5G vs Vivo V29
What Moto G54 5G does better (6) and where V29 wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display8.8
5.4Performance5.2
8.2Camera8.5
6.0Battery6.3
6.9Features7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G54 5GV29
| Moto G54 5G | V29 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.2 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 74.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.5 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 186 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G54 5G better than V29?
- Stereo speakersYes · V29: No
- AnTuTu score639,509 vs 544,639+17%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+9%
- Memory card slotYes · V29: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · V29: No
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is V29 better than Moto G54 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 80 W2.4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
- Peak brightness560 nits vs 1,300 nits2.3×
- Measured brightness469 nits vs 996 nits2.1×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G54 5G: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,248 vs 2,797+24%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto G54 5G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Charged in 30 min45% vs 88%+96%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 453 ppi+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Blue, Green | Space Black, Himalayan Blue, Purple Fairy, Majestic Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 560 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 469 nits | 996 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 90.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 639,509 | 544,639 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,248 | 2,797 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 8× | — |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 45% | 88% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.94 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
