- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G53 vs Redmi Note 11 SE (India)
Motorola Moto G53 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE (India)
What Moto G53 does better (6) and where Redmi Note 11 SE (India) wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Display6.5
4.6Camera7.0
4.6Battery6.0
9.1Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G53Redmi Note 11 SE (India)
| Moto G53 | Redmi Note 11 SE (India) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 160.5 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 74.5 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 179 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G53 better than Redmi Note 11 SE (India)?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- 5GYes · Redmi Note 11 SE (India): No
- eSIMYes · Redmi Note 11 SE (India): No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+7%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi Note 11 SE (India) better than Moto G53?
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,100 nits2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G53: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 409 ppi+51%
- Charged in 30 min22% vs 54%2.5×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto G53: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Weight183 g vs 179 g+2%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Ink Blue, Arctic Silver, Pale Pink | Thunder Purple, Cosmic White, Shadow Black, Bifrost Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | 599 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9% | 83.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 314,195 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,594 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 292 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 22% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | MIUI 12.5 |
