- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G47 Power vs Xever 8
Motorola Moto G47 Power vs RugOne Xever 8
What Moto G47 Power does better (11) and where Xever 8 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display6.0
5.6Camera6.4
8.1Battery3.2
6.8Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G47 PowerXever 8
| Moto G47 Power | Xever 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.2 mm | 168 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 80 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 14 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Weight | 215 g | 320 g | −105 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G47 Power better than Xever 8?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+46%
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Wired charging30 W vs 18 W+67%
- Peak brightness1,050 nits vs 680 nits+54%
- Weight215 g vs 320 g+49%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 14 mm+57%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.3% vs 75.9%+11%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is Xever 8 better than Moto G47 Power?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 405 ppi+53%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- eSIMNo · Moto G47 Power: Yes
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 215 g | 320 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 166.2 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Pantone: Capri, Impenetrable, Nautical Blue | Black, Sand Dune |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,050 nits | 680 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 75.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 590,471 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,394 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 78 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
