- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G41 vs Galaxy XCover6 Pro
Motorola Moto G41 vs Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
What Moto G41 does better (9) and where Galaxy XCover6 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display5.8
7.4Camera6.7
5.5Battery3.0
5.0Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G41Galaxy XCover6 Pro
| Moto G41 | Galaxy XCover6 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 168.8 mm | −6.9 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 79.9 mm | −6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.9 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 235 g | −57 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G41 better than Galaxy XCover6 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,050 mAh+23%
- OLED panelYes · Galaxy XCover6 Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy XCover6 Pro: No
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Weight178 g vs 235 g+32%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 400 ppi+3%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 9.9 mm+19%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.7% vs 77.8%+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy XCover6 Pro better than Moto G41?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- 5GNo · Moto G41: Yes
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.6″+3%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 235 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 168.8 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 79.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Meteorite Black, Pearl Gold | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 493 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.7% | 77.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 697,431 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,842 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 70% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.48 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.0 |
