- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G41 vs Galaxy A25
Motorola Moto G41 vs Samsung Galaxy A25
What Moto G41 does better (4) and where Galaxy A25 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display7.5
7.4Camera8.0
5.5Battery3.1
5.0Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G41Galaxy A25
| Moto G41 | Galaxy A25 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 161 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76.5 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.3 mm | = |
| Weight | 178 g | 197 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G41 better than Galaxy A25?
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Weight178 g vs 197 g+11%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 396 ppi+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy A25 better than Moto G41?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · Moto G41: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G41: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Process12 nm vs 5 nm2.4×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 161 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Meteorite Black, Pearl Gold | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,030 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.7% | 84.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 | Exynos 1280 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 443,234 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,023 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 643 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.3 h |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 49% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.46 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
