- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G40 Fusion vs 12X
Motorola Moto G40 Fusion vs Xiaomi 12X
What Moto G40 Fusion does better (8) and where 12X wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.5
8.0Camera9.2
7.3Battery5.5
6.4Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G40 Fusion12X
| Moto G40 Fusion | 12X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.6 mm | 152.7 mm | +16.9 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 69.9 mm | +6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 8.2 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 225 g | 176 g | +49 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G40 Fusion better than 12X?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Memory card slotYes · 12X: No
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · 12X: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · 12X: No
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.3″+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
Why is 12X better than Moto G40 Fusion?
- Wired charging20 W vs 67 W3.4×
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G40 Fusion: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G40 Fusion: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Moto G40 Fusion: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G40 Fusion: Yes
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+39%
- Weight225 g vs 176 g+28%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 225 g | 176 g |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 169.6 mm | 152.7 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 69.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Gray, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 419 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 923 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3% | 89.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 598,003 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,168 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,216 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 77% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.85 W/kg | 0.59 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 13 |
