- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G40 Fusion vs Galaxy F22
Motorola Moto G40 Fusion vs Samsung Galaxy F22
What Moto G40 Fusion does better (14) and where Galaxy F22 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display5.8
8.0Camera5.7
7.3Battery6.6
6.4Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G40 FusionGalaxy F22
| Moto G40 Fusion | Galaxy F22 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.6 mm | 160 mm | +9.6 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 74 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 9.4 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 225 g | 203 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G40 Fusion better than Galaxy F22?
- NFCYes · Galaxy F22: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Wired charging20 W vs 15 W+33%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 274 ppi+44%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Galaxy F22: No
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz+15%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
Why is Galaxy F22 better than Moto G40 Fusion?
- OLED panelNo · Moto G40 Fusion: Yes
- Weight225 g vs 203 g+11%
- Thickness9.7 mm vs 9.4 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 225 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 169.6 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Denim Black, Denim Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3% | 83.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.85 W/kg | 0.62 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI core 5.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 5GvsMotorola Moto G40 Fusion7.97.9
vsGoogle Pixel 6vsMotorola Moto G40 Fusion8.07.9
vsSamsung Galaxy S21+ 5GvsMotorola Moto G40 Fusion8.17.9vs
Motorola Moto G40 FusionvsOPPO Find X3 Neo7.98.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy F23vsSamsung Galaxy F227.16.1
vsSamsung Galaxy F13vsSamsung Galaxy F226.26.1