- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G30 vs Galaxy M32
Motorola Moto G30 vs Samsung Galaxy M32
What Moto G30 does better (4) and where Galaxy M32 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Display6.9
2.2Performance2.5
6.7Camera7.1
5.0Battery5.3
4.1Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G30Galaxy M32
| Moto G30 | Galaxy M32 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.2 mm | 159.3 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 74 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 180 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G30 better than Galaxy M32?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,265 vs 1,205+5%
- Process11 nm vs 12 nm+9%
- Charged in 30 min32% vs 30%+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy M32 better than Moto G30?
- AnTuTu score170,968 vs 280,002+64%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G30: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 800 nits+78%
- Wired charging20 W vs 25 W+25%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 411 ppi+53%
- Measured brightness468 nits vs 713 nits+52%
- Weight200 g vs 180 g+11%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 20 MP+54%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 8.4 mm+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.2% vs 83.9%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 165.2 mm | 159.3 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Phantom Black (Dark Pearl), Pastel Sky | Black, Light Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 468 nits | 713 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.2% | 83.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 11 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 170,968 | 280,002 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,265 | 1,205 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 171 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 32% | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.11 W/kg | 0.56 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
