- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G17 vs Redmi A7 Pro 4G
Motorola Moto G17 vs Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 4G
What Moto G17 does better (18) and where Redmi A7 Pro 4G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.3Display6.3
6.8Camera3.4
6.5Battery6.6
5.5Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G17Redmi A7 Pro 4G
| Moto G17 | Redmi A7 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 171.6 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 79.5 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm | = |
| Weight | 190 g | 208 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G17 better than Redmi A7 Pro 4G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi A7 Pro 4G: No
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Pixel density392 ppi vs 254 ppi+54%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Peak brightness1,050 nits vs 800 nits+31%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Redmi A7 Pro 4G: No
Why is Redmi A7 Pro 4G better than Moto G17?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+15%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 171.6 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Bordeaux, Alaskan Blue, Evening Blue | Black, Mist Blue, Palm Green, Sunset Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,050 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.6% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Extreme | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 335,081 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,298 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/3.06" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 57 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
