- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G17 Power vs Galaxy M17e
Motorola Moto G17 Power vs Samsung Galaxy M17e
What Moto G17 Power does better (13) and where Galaxy M17e wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.3Display5.8
6.8Camera4.6
7.6Battery7.5
5.5Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G17 PowerGalaxy M17e
| Moto G17 Power | Galaxy M17e | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 167.4 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 77.4 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 199 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G17 Power better than Galaxy M17e?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- NFCYes · Galaxy M17e: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy M17e: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Pixel density392 ppi vs 262 ppi+50%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Peak brightness1,050 nits vs 800 nits+31%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Galaxy M17e: No
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Galaxy M17e better than Moto G17 Power?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- 5GNo · Moto G17 Power: Yes
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.2 mm+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 167.4 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Alaskan Blue, Evening Blue | Blitz Blue, Vibe Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,050 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.6% | 83.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Extreme | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 349,240 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,302 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.23 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
