- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G14 vs Galaxy A24 4G
Motorola Moto G14 vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
What Moto G14 does better (6) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Display7.0
3.2Performance3.7
4.6Camera7.8
5.0Battery5.3
4.6Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G14Galaxy A24 4G
| Moto G14 | Galaxy A24 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 162.1 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 77.6 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 195 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G14 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A24 4G: No
- Weight177 g vs 195 g+10%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 396 ppi+2%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.6% vs 82.4%+4%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.3 mm+4%
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Moto G14?
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 1,000 nits2.5×
- Measured brightness474 nits vs 1,012 nits2.1×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G14: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G14: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,490 vs 1,890+27%
- Wired charging20 W vs 25 W+25%
- AnTuTu score388,158 vs 398,005+3%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto G14: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | Panda glass | — |
| Colours | Steel Gray, Sky Blue, Butter Cream, Pale Lilac | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 474 nits | 1,012 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 82.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 388,158 | 398,005 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,490 | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 344 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 46% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass (market/region dependent) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
