- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G14 vs Galaxy A15
Motorola Moto G14 vs Samsung Galaxy A15
What Moto G14 does better (5) and where Galaxy A15 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Display6.7
3.2Performance3.4
4.6Camera6.2
5.0Battery6.6
4.6Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G14Galaxy A15
| Moto G14 | Galaxy A15 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 160.1 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76.8 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 200 g | −23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G14 better than Galaxy A15?
- AnTuTu score388,158 vs 316,967+22%
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A15: No
- Weight177 g vs 200 g+13%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 396 ppi+2%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.4 mm+5%
Why is Galaxy A15 better than Moto G14?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G14: Yes
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 800 nits2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,490 vs 1,928+29%
- Measured brightness474 nits vs 808 nits+70%
- Wired charging20 W vs 25 W+25%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto G14: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Charged in 30 min30% vs 47%+57%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 160.1 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | Panda glass | — |
| Colours | Steel Gray, Sky Blue, Butter Cream, Pale Lilac | Brave Black, Optimistic Blue, Magical Blue, Personality Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 474 nits | 808 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 388,158 | 316,967 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,490 | 1,928 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 338 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 15.5 h |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 47% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass (market/region dependent) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.42 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
