- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G100 vs Camon 40 Pro 4G
Motorola Moto G100 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
What Moto G100 does better (9) and where Camon 40 Pro 4G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display8.6
7.1Camera9.1
8.1Battery7.9
6.8Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G100Camon 40 Pro 4G
| Moto G100 | Camon 40 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.2 mm | 164.4 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 74.3 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.3 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 210 g | 178 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G100 better than Camon 40 Pro 4G?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+35%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 40 Pro 4G better than Moto G100?
- Wired charging30 W vs 45 W+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G100: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G100: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · Moto G100: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Weight210 g vs 178 g+18%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 7.3 mm+18%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.8% vs 90%+5%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 166.2 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Green | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,050 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.8% | 90% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 600,062 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
