android.gs
Compare
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Blade A75

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs ZTE Blade A75

What Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) does better (19) and where Blade A75 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)

7.5Score

19 advantages≈ $170

Higher score

ZTE · 2024Blade A75

6.6Score

0 advantages≈ $180

8.1Display5.7

8.3Camera5.4

5.3Battery4.6

5.7Features7.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)Blade A75

	Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)	Blade A75	Difference
Height	162.6 mm	163.6 mm	−1 mm
Width	74.8 mm	74.9 mm	−0.1 mm
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.6 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	190 g	206 g	−16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) better than Blade A75?

RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
Wired charging30 W vs 18 W+67%
OLED panelYes · Blade A75: No
Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · Blade A75: No
Wireless chargingYes · Blade A75: No
Stereo speakersYes · Blade A75: No
Pixel density395 ppi vs 266 ppi+48%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
Memory card slotYes · Blade A75: No
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade A75: No

Why is Blade A75 better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)?

Blade A75 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)≈ $1707.5	ZTE Blade A75≈ $1806.6
Design
Weight	190 g	206 g
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.6 mm
Height	162.6 mm	163.6 mm
Width	74.8 mm	74.9 mm
Frame	Plastic	—
Back	Eco leather	—
Ingress protection	IP52	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	—
Colours	Caramel Latte, Scarlet Wave	Black, Mint Green
Stylus	Yes	—
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.6″
Panel	P-OLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	720 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	1,612 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	266 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,200 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,387 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	88.2%	86%
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1	Unisoc T760
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Unisoc
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Mali-G57
AnTuTu score	549,817	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,664	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	606	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	4 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	—
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Active use (test)	12.7 h	—
Wired charging	30 W	18 W
Charged in 30 min	53%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.1	5.2
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	—
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.3 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Major OS updates promised	1	—