android.gs
Compare
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Galaxy A24 4G

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G

What Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) does better (21) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)

7.5Score

21 advantages≈ $170

Higher score

Samsung · 2023Galaxy A24 4G

6.8Score

2 advantages≈ $160

8.1Display7.0

4.8Performance3.7

8.3Camera7.8

5.3Battery5.3

5.7Features5.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)Galaxy A24 4G

	Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)	Galaxy A24 4G	Difference
Height	162.6 mm	162.1 mm	+0.5 mm
Width	74.8 mm	77.6 mm	−2.8 mm
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.3 mm	=
Weight	190 g	195 g	−5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) better than Galaxy A24 4G?

AnTuTu score549,817 vs 398,005+38%
Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy A24 4G: No
5GYes · Galaxy A24 4G: No
Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A24 4G: No
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,664 vs 1,890+41%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme606 vs 344+76%
Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
Measured brightness1,387 nits vs 1,012 nits+37%
Max video4K vs 1080p

Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)?

Major OS updates promised1 vs 44×
Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)≈ $1707.5	Samsung Galaxy A24 4G≈ $1606.8
Design
Weight	190 g	195 g
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.3 mm
Height	162.6 mm	162.1 mm
Width	74.8 mm	77.6 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Eco leather	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP52	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	—
Colours	Caramel Latte, Scarlet Wave	Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red
Stylus	Yes	—
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.5″
Panel	P-OLED	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	396 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	1,200 nits	1,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,387 nits	1,012 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.2%	82.4%
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1	Mediatek Helio G99
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	549,817	398,005
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,664	1,890
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	606	344
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/2.76"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	32 MP	13 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	12.7 h	—
Wired charging	30 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	53%	46%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.1	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.3 LUFS	-28.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.41 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 8.5
Major OS updates promised	1	4