- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Pro vs Galaxy A41
Motorola Moto G Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A41
What Moto G Pro does better (12) and where Galaxy A41 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display5.2
2.1Performance2.3
6.5Camera5.9
2.6Battery2.5
6.2Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G ProGalaxy A41
| Moto G Pro | Galaxy A41 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.6 mm | 149.9 mm | +8.7 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 69.8 mm | +6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 7.9 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 152 g | +40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Pro better than Galaxy A41?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A41: No
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 3,500 mAh+14%
- AnTuTu score173,611 vs 170,044+2%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,385 vs 1,175+18%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.1″+5%
- Measured brightness642 nits vs 624 nits+3%
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.5 LUFS vs -30.5 LUFS+-20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/2+18%
- Process11 nm vs 12 nm+9%
Why is Galaxy A41 better than Moto G Pro?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G Pro: Yes
- Weight192 g vs 152 g+26%
- Pixel density399 ppi vs 431 ppi+8%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 25 MP+56%
- Thickness9.2 mm vs 7.9 mm+16%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.7% vs 85.9%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 152 g |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 158.6 mm | 149.9 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 69.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Mystic indigo | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Red |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,300 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 399 ppi | 431 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 642 nits | 624 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7% | 85.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 11 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 173,611 | 170,044 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,385 | 1,175 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 25 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 3,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.5 LUFS | -30.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.59 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 4.1 |
