- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Power (2026) vs Z-Pro Plus
Motorola Moto G Power (2026) vs ZEED Z-Pro Plus
What Moto G Power (2026) does better (13) and where Z-Pro Plus wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display5.7
8.3Camera3.9
5.9Battery7.0
9.2Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Power (2026)Z-Pro Plus
| Moto G Power (2026) | Z-Pro Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.6 mm | 167.9 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 77.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.5 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 206 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Power (2026) better than Z-Pro Plus?
- Wired charging30 W vs 18 W+67%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Z-Pro Plus: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Z-Pro Plus: No
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 600 nits+67%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 260 ppi+49%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Z-Pro Plus: No
- eSIMYes · Z-Pro Plus: No
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Z-Pro Plus better than Moto G Power (2026)?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+15%
- Thickness8.7 mm vs 8.5 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 166.6 mm | 167.9 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Oleophobic coating |
| Colours | Pantone: Evening Blue, Pure Cashmere | Black, Blue, Red, Green, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 940 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 84.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 424,581 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,114 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 382 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 13.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -19.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.3 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
