android.gs
Compare
Moto G Power (2026) vs RugKing 5 Pro

Motorola Moto G Power (2026) vs UleFone RugKing 5 Pro

What Moto G Power (2026) does better (14) and where RugKing 5 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2026Moto G Power (2026)

7.7Score

14 advantages≈ $180

Higher score

UleFone · 2026RugKing 5 Pro

7.4Score

6 advantages≈ $180

7.1Display5.4

8.2Camera6.1

5.9Battery8.8

9.2Features6.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto G Power (2026)RugKing 5 Pro

	Moto G Power (2026)	RugKing 5 Pro	Difference
Height	166.6 mm	179 mm	−12.4 mm
Width	77.1 mm	85 mm	−7.9 mm
Thickness	8.7 mm	26.5 mm	−17.8 mm
Weight	208 g	629 g	−421 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto G Power (2026) better than RugKing 5 Pro?

Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
Weight208 g vs 629 g3×
Optical stabilisationYes · RugKing 5 Pro: No
5GYes · RugKing 5 Pro: No
Stereo speakersYes · RugKing 5 Pro: No
Thickness8.7 mm vs 26.5 mm3×
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+33%
Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · RugKing 5 Pro: No
Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
eSIMYes · RugKing 5 Pro: No
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · RugKing 5 Pro: No

Why is RugKing 5 Pro better than Moto G Power (2026)?

Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 20,000 mAh3.8×
Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Pixel density387 ppi vs 396 ppi+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Moto G Power (2026)≈ $1807.7	UleFone RugKing 5 Pro≈ $1807.4
Design
Weight	208 g	629 g
Thickness	8.7 mm	26.5 mm
Height	166.6 mm	179 mm
Width	77.1 mm	85 mm
Frame	Plastic	—
Back	Eco leather	—
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Colours	Pantone: Evening Blue, Pure Cashmere	Black
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,388 px	2,460 px
Pixel density	387 ppi	396 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	60 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	910 nits
Measured brightness	940 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	86.3%	71.7%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 6300	Unisoc T7250
Chip maker	MediaTek	Unisoc
Process	6 nm	12 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	1.8 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G57 MP1
AnTuTu score	424,581	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,114	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	382	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/2.88"	—
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	32 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,200 mAh	20,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	13.3 h	—
Wired charging	30 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	47%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.2
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-19.4 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	110 h
Repairability class	—	B
Drop resistance class	—	A

Related comparisons

Motorola Moto G Power (2026)vsInfinix Note Edge7.77.7