- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Power (2026) vs K70 5G
Motorola Moto G Power (2026) vs TCL K70 5G
What Moto G Power (2026) does better (13) and where K70 5G wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display5.8
8.2Camera4.6
5.9Battery7.7
9.2Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Power (2026)K70 5G
| Moto G Power (2026) | K70 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.6 mm | 168 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 79.5 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 197 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Power (2026) better than K70 5G?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · K70 5G: No
- 5GYes · K70 5G: No
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 256 ppi+51%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 750 nits+33%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · K70 5G: No
- eSIMYes · K70 5G: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is K70 5G better than Moto G Power (2026)?
- Weight208 g vs 197 g+6%
- Thickness8.7 mm vs 8.3 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 166.6 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Pantone: Evening Blue, Pure Cashmere | Midnight Black, Stardust Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 1,570 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 256 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 750 nits |
| Measured brightness | 940 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 84% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 424,581 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,114 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 382 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 13.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -19.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | proximity, accelerometer, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 58 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
