- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Power (2026) vs Galaxy F70
Motorola Moto G Power (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy F70
What Moto G Power (2026) does better (9) and where Galaxy F70 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display7.5
8.2Camera7.8
5.9Battery5.3
9.2Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Power (2026)Galaxy F70
| Moto G Power (2026) | Galaxy F70 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.6 mm | 164.4 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 77.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 7.5 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 192 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Power (2026) better than Galaxy F70?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy F70: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- eSIMYes · Galaxy F70: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy F70: No
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is Galaxy F70 better than Moto G Power (2026)?
- OLED panelNo · Moto G Power (2026): Yes
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,400 nits+40%
- Weight208 g vs 192 g+8%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Thickness8.7 mm vs 7.5 mm+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 166.6 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Pantone: Evening Blue, Pure Cashmere | Vivid Violet, Bold Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 940 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 424,581 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,114 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 382 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 13.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -19.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
