- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Power (2026) vs K14
Motorola Moto G Power (2026) vs OPPO K14
What Moto G Power (2026) does better (10) and where K14 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display6.4
8.2Camera4.6
5.9Battery8.8
9.2Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Power (2026)K14
| Moto G Power (2026) | K14 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.6 mm | 166.6 mm | = |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 78.5 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.6 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 216 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Power (2026) better than K14?
- Optical stabilisationYes · K14: No
- NFCYes · K14: No
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 256 ppi+51%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · K14: No
- eSIMYes · K14: No
- Weight208 g vs 216 g+4%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Charged in 30 min47% vs 37%+27%
Why is K14 better than Moto G Power (2026)?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+35%
- Wired charging30 W vs 45 W+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,125 nits+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 216 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 166.6 mm | 166.6 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Evening Blue, Pure Cashmere | Prism Violet, Prism White, Icy Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 1,570 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 256 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,125 nits |
| Measured brightness | 940 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 85.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 424,581 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,114 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 382 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 13.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | 37% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -19.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.14 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 15 |
