- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Power (2025) vs RugKing 4 Pro
Motorola Moto G Power (2025) vs UleFone RugKing 4 Pro
What Moto G Power (2025) does better (20) and where RugKing 4 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.2
8.0Camera3.9
4.8Battery7.9
7.7Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Power (2025)RugKing 4 Pro
| Moto G Power (2025) | RugKing 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.6 mm | 178.6 mm | −12 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 84 mm | −6.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 19.2 mm | −10.5 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 405 g | −197 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Power (2025) better than RugKing 4 Pro?
- Wired charging30 W vs 18 W+67%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 500 nits2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · RugKing 4 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · RugKing 4 Pro: No
- 5GYes · RugKing 4 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · RugKing 4 Pro: No
- Weight208 g vs 405 g+95%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 269 ppi+43%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+33%
- Thickness8.7 mm vs 19.2 mm2.2×
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
Why is RugKing 4 Pro better than Moto G Power (2025)?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 10,200 mAh2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 405 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 19.2 mm |
| Height | 166.6 mm | 178.6 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 84 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Slate Gray, Leaf Green | Black, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 993 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.2% | 68.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 440,530 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,090 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 383 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 10,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -22.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
