- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Power (2025) vs Spark 40
Motorola Moto G Power (2025) vs Tecno Spark 40
What Moto G Power (2025) does better (12) and where Spark 40 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display6.1
8.0Camera4.1
4.8Battery7.0
7.7Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Power (2025)Spark 40
| Moto G Power (2025) | Spark 40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.6 mm | 167.7 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 77.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 194 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Power (2025) better than Spark 40?
- Wired charging30 W vs 18 W+67%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Spark 40: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Spark 40: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Spark 40: No
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 260 ppi+48%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 5 MP3.2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Spark 40: No
- eSIMYes · Spark 40: No
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.2% vs 84.2%+4%
Why is Spark 40 better than Moto G Power (2025)?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Weight208 g vs 194 g+7%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
- Thickness8.7 mm vs 8 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 194 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 166.6 mm | 167.7 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Slate Gray, Leaf Green | Sky Blue, Ink Black, Turquoise Green, Bikaner Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 993 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.2% | 84.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 440,530 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,090 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 383 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -22.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
