- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Play (2026) vs nubia Focus 2
Motorola Moto G Play (2026) vs ZTE nubia Focus 2
What Moto G Play (2026) does better (5) and where nubia Focus 2 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display6.2
3.8Camera6.7
7.7Battery5.1
9.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Play (2026)nubia Focus 2
| Moto G Play (2026) | nubia Focus 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 163.6 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74.9 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8 mm | +0.5 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Play (2026) better than nubia Focus 2?
- Stereo speakersYes · nubia Focus 2: No
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- eSIMYes · nubia Focus 2: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · nubia Focus 2: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
Why is nubia Focus 2 better than Moto G Play (2026)?
- Main camera32 MP vs 108 MP3.4×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Wired charging18 W vs 22 W+25%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Main camera aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.8+22%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 8 mm+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.7% vs 88.4%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Pantone Tapestry | Aurora White, Cerulean Blue, Obsidian Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 920 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 88.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Unisoc T760 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 |
| AnTuTu score | 402,175 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,074 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 384 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 32 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 17.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 22 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -21 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 44 h |
| Repairability class | — | A |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
