- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Play (2026) vs Poco C71
Motorola Moto G Play (2026) vs Xiaomi Poco C71
What Moto G Play (2026) does better (10) and where Poco C71 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display5.9
3.5Performance2.4
3.8Camera3.8
7.7Battery5.8
9.1Features2.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Play (2026)Poco C71
| Moto G Play (2026) | Poco C71 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 171.8 mm | −4.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.8 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 193 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Play (2026) better than Poco C71?
- AnTuTu score402,175 vs 322,517+25%
- 5GYes · Poco C71: No
- NFCYes · Poco C71: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco C71: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,074 vs 1,438+44%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 600 nits+67%
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+33%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- eSIMYes · Poco C71: No
Why is Poco C71 better than Moto G Play (2026)?
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight202 g vs 193 g+5%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
- Main camera aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.8+22%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.3 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 171.8 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Pantone Tapestry | Power Black, Cool Blue, Desert Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 920 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 84.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 402,175 | 322,517 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,074 | 1,438 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 384 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 17.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 24% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -21 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.82 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 or Android 15 (Go edition) |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | Android Go |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
