- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Play (2026) vs Y39
Motorola Moto G Play (2026) vs Vivo Y39
What Moto G Play (2026) does better (6) and where Y39 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display6.2
3.5Performance4.8
3.8Camera4.6
7.7Battery8.4
9.1Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Play (2026)Y39
| Moto G Play (2026) | Y39 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 165.7 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 205 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Play (2026) better than Y39?
- NFCYes · Y39: No
- Memory card slotYes · Y39: No
- eSIMYes · Y39: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Y39: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Y39 better than Moto G Play (2026)?
- Wired charging18 W vs 44 W2.4×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- AnTuTu score402,175 vs 577,028+43%
- Main camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+25%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,074 vs 2,152+4%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.8+22%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.3 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Schott Glass |
| Colours | Pantone Tapestry | Lotus Purple, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 1,608 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 920 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 402,175 | 577,028 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,074 | 2,152 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 384 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 17.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 37% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -21 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | Funtouch 15 |
